ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Screening for severe coronary stenosis in patients with apparently normal electrocardiograms based on deep learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning predicts stent implantation in borderline coronary lesions from angiography.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- ECGomics: An Open Platform for AI-ECG Digital Biomarker Discovery.Health data science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with severe coronary arterystenosis may present with apparently normal electrocardiograms (ECGs), making it difficult to detect adverse health conditions during routine screenings or physical examinations. Consequently, these patients might miss the optimal window for treatment.
methodsWe aimed to develop an effective model to distinguish severe coronary stenosis from no or mild coronary stenosis in patients with apparently normal ECGs. A total of 392 patients, including 138 with severe stenosis, were selected for the study. Deep learning (DL) models were trained from scratch and using pre-trained parameters via transfer learning. These models were evaluated based on ECG data alone and in combination with clinical information, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and smoking status.
resultsWe found that DL models trained from scratch using ECG data alone achieved a specificity of 74.6% but exhibited low sensitivity (54.5%), comparable to the performance of logistic regression using clinical data. Adding clinical information to the ECG DL model trained from scratch improved sensitivity (90.9%) but reduced specificity (42.3%). The best performance was achieved by combining clinical information with the ECG transfer learning model, resulting in an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.847, with 84.8% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity.
conclusionsThe findings demonstrate the effectiveness of DL models in identifying severe coronary stenosis in patients with apparently normal ECGs and validate an efficient approach utilizing existing ECG models. By employing transfer learning techniques, we can extract "deep features" that summarize the inherent information of ECGs with relatively low computational expense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.