ArticleMicrobial cell factories2024
Multiscale modelling of bioprocess dynamics and cellular growth.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coarse-grained resource allocation modeling for decoding and rewiring microbial metabolism.Trends in microbiology · 2026Review
- Host-aware Identification of Intrinsic Gene Expression Biopart Parameters using Combinatorial Libraries.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Regulation of Escherichia coli fermentation processes: from molecular mechanisms to smart industrial practice.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Physics-constrained neural ordinary differential equation models to discover and predict microbial community dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Alterations in Gene Expression and Alternative Splicing Induced by Plasmid-Mediated Overexpression of GFP andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFermentation processes are essential for the production of small molecules, heterologous proteins and other commercially important products. Traditional bioprocess optimisation relies on phenomenological models that focus on macroscale variables like biomass growth and protein yield. However, these models often fail to consider the crucial link between macroscale dynamics and the intracellular activities that drive metabolism and proteins synthesis.
resultsWe introduce a multiscale model that not only captures batch bioreactor dynamics but also incorporates a coarse-grained approach to key intracellular processes such as gene expression, ribosome allocation and growth. Our model accurately fits biomass and substrate data across various Escherichia coli strains, effectively predicts acetate dynamics and evaluates the expression of heterologous proteins. By integrating construct-specific parameters like promoter strength and ribosomal binding sites, our model reveals several key interdependencies between gene expression parameters and outputs such as protein yield and acetate secretion.
conclusionsThis study presents a computational model that, with proper parameterisation, allows for the in silico analysis of genetic constructs. The focus is on combinations of ribosomal binding site (RBS) strength and promoters, assessing their impact on production. In this way, the ability to predict bioreactor dynamics from these genetic constructs can pave the way for more efficient design and optimisation of microbial fermentation processes, enhancing the production of valuable bioproducts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.