Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578803›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Reappraisal of safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: it is feasible for the pioneer surgical team.

Yi Chan Chen, Ruey-Shyang Soong, Po-Hsing Chiang, Shion Wei Chai, Chih-Ying Chien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi Chan ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist, Keelung city, 204201, Taiwan.
Ruey-Shyang SoongDivision of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Taipei Municipal Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei city, Taiwan.
Po-Hsing ChiangDepartment of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist, Keelung city, 204201, Taiwan.
Shion Wei ChaiDepartment of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist, Keelung city, 204201, Taiwan.
Chih-Ying ChienDepartment of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist, Keelung city, 204201, Taiwan. hjjiimm@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9305-4619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent in Taiwan, primarily due to the high incidence of hepatitis B and C infections, with high recurrence rates of 50-70% within five years after initial treatment. Treatment options for recurrent HCC include salvage liver transplantation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, re-hepatectomy, and radiofrequency ablation. Repeat hepatectomy exhibits superior oncological outcomes compared with alternative approaches. Although laparoscopic liver resection has demonstrated safety and feasibility for primary HCC resection, the persistence of intrahepatic recurrence necessitates effective intervention. However, repeat liver resection poses several challenges including adhesions from previous surgeries, limited access to recurrent tumors, altered liver structure post-regeneration, difficulties in obtaining hilar control, and compromised liver reserves. Suggesting a laparoscopic approach for recurrent HCC is typically based on the surgeons' experience and confidence. In this study, we reconfirmed the safety, feasibility and oncological outcome of laparoscopic repeat liver resection and investigated the optimal timing for initiation of this procedure by a pioneering team in minimally invasive liver resection.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed our collective experience of 57 patients with recurrent HCC between January 2009 and December 2021.The patients were followed until June 30, 2024. Among them, 37 underwent laparoscopic approaches and 20 opted for open procedures.

resultsBoth groups exhibited similar operative times and perioperative outcomes, with significantly reduced hospital stays in the laparoscopic cohort (median: 5 vs. 7, p < 0.001). The median follow-up duration was 41.5 months (range, 2.8 to 112.6 months). Mortality occurred in 22 patients (38.6%) and recurrence occurred in 26 patients (45.6%) The overall survival and disease-free survival after the operation were similar in both groups and comparative to the literatures.

conclusionUsing a stepwise approach, laparoscopic repeat liver resection can be performed safely and effectively with a low incidence of conversion by an experienced surgical team with similar oncological outcomes. The introduction of laparoscopic techniques has also sparked a strategic shift in the surgical approach for recurrent HCC. This treatment option should be offered to patients by an experienced surgical team for minimally invasive liver resections.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularFeasibility StudiesHepatectomyLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReoperationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTaiwanTreatment OutcomeHepatocellular carcinomaLaparoscopic repeat liver resectionMinimally invasive hepatectomy

Identifiers

PMID39578803
PMCPMC11583780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.