ArticleBMC medical education2024
Evaluation of an evidence-based practice education workshop focused on critical appraisal for advanced practice nurses: A before-after intervention study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Hospital Care: Impact of an Evidence-Based Practice Course on Healthcare Professionals' Competencies in a Randomized Clinical Trial.Worldviews on evidence-based nursing · 2026Trial
- Using AI in healthcare education: a rapid review and commentary.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Establishing a certificate in the analysis of medical data: a cross-sectional evaluation of a continuing professional development course in biostatistics in for healthcare professionals in Qatar.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRegarding the evidence-based practice (EBP) process, nurses tend to perceive that critical appraisal of research articles is challenging. Though critical appraisal in EBP has been a frequent topic in medical education, implementing and disseminating existing EBP education for nurses are challenging in countries with limited EBP educational resources. This study aimed to evaluate changes in practice, attitude, knowledge and skills of EBP before and after an EBP workshop focused on critical appraisal among advanced practice nurses.
methodsThis study was a before and after educational intervention study. The workshops were provided in small groups in 2017 and 2018. The targeted nurses were certified nurse specialists (CNSs) who provide patient care and are certified as advanced practice nurses. The workshop was designed to include at least one CNS in each group. The Japanese version of the Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire, with four subscales-practice, attitude, and knowledge and skills of research and practice-was evaluated four times: baseline, immediately after the workshop, and 3 and 6 months after the workshop. At the end of the workshop, the participants wrote their learning objectives and plans for improving their critical appraisal of EBP. A self-reflection questionnaire was distributed 3 months after the workshop, and a qualitative descriptive analysis was used.
resultsEleven CNSs participated in this study. Only the score of the knowledge and skills of research showed a statistically significant change. Many participants did not perform critical appraisal of research articles after the workshop. The facilitators were to have a role in integrating research evidence into practice and the barriers to being too busy, personnel transfers, and insufficient conditions.
conclusionsSelf-efficacy for critical appraisal in EBP might increase through the EBP education workshop. Even nurses interested in EBP require ongoing learning opportunities and organizational support for EBP activities.
trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered with University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMINCTR) on 09/14/2018 (Registration Number. UMIN000034146).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.