Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578799›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Evaluation of an evidence-based practice education workshop focused on critical appraisal for advanced practice nurses: A before-after intervention study.

Ai Tomotaki, Ikuko Sakai, Hiroki Fukahori, Yasunobu Tsuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Using AI in healthcare education: a rapid review and commentary.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ai TomotakiNational College of Nursing, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-2-1 Umezono, Kiyose-shi, Tokyo, 204-8575, Japan. atomotaki-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Ikuko SakaiDepartment of Advanced Clinical Nursing, Frontier Clinical Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba university 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8672, Japan.
Hiroki FukahoriFaculty of Nursing and Medical Care, KEIO UNIVERSITY, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0883, Japan.
Yasunobu TsudaSt. Marianna University Hospital, 2-16-1 Sugao, Miyamae, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JSPS-JP-16H07464 and 18K17452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegarding the evidence-based practice (EBP) process, nurses tend to perceive that critical appraisal of research articles is challenging. Though critical appraisal in EBP has been a frequent topic in medical education, implementing and disseminating existing EBP education for nurses are challenging in countries with limited EBP educational resources. This study aimed to evaluate changes in practice, attitude, knowledge and skills of EBP before and after an EBP workshop focused on critical appraisal among advanced practice nurses.

methodsThis study was a before and after educational intervention study. The workshops were provided in small groups in 2017 and 2018. The targeted nurses were certified nurse specialists (CNSs) who provide patient care and are certified as advanced practice nurses. The workshop was designed to include at least one CNS in each group. The Japanese version of the Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire, with four subscales-practice, attitude, and knowledge and skills of research and practice-was evaluated four times: baseline, immediately after the workshop, and 3 and 6 months after the workshop. At the end of the workshop, the participants wrote their learning objectives and plans for improving their critical appraisal of EBP. A self-reflection questionnaire was distributed 3 months after the workshop, and a qualitative descriptive analysis was used.

resultsEleven CNSs participated in this study. Only the score of the knowledge and skills of research showed a statistically significant change. Many participants did not perform critical appraisal of research articles after the workshop. The facilitators were to have a role in integrating research evidence into practice and the barriers to being too busy, personnel transfers, and insufficient conditions.

conclusionsSelf-efficacy for critical appraisal in EBP might increase through the EBP education workshop. Even nurses interested in EBP require ongoing learning opportunities and organizational support for EBP activities.

trial registrationThis study was retrospectively registered with University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMINCTR) on 09/14/2018 (Registration Number. UMIN000034146).

Indexed as

Advanced Practice NursingAdultClinical CompetenceEvidence-Based NursingEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansJapanMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvanced practice nursingEducationEvidence-based practiceInformation literacyNurse cliniciansProfessional

Identifiers

PMID39578799
PMCPMC11585217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.