SynthesisBMC oral health2024
Comparison of the antibacterial properties of Resin cements with and without the addition of nanoparticles: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of silica nanoparticle sedimentation on the mechanical, surface properties and trueness of DLP-printed dental resin.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Bioactive Resin Cement Color Stability and Restoration Thickness as Determinants of the Final Shade in a Glass-Ceramic CAD/CAM Material.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- An Innovative Phyto-mediated Nanocomposite-modified Glass Ionomer Cement: A Detailed Study on Synthesis, Cytotoxicity, Anti-inflammatory Effects, Antimicrobial Activity, Mechanical Performance, and Solubility.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resin cement exhibits numerous therapeutic advantages over conventional luting materials. However, the effectiveness of the antibacterial properties of resin cement remains unclear. Nanotechnology provides a viable option, whereby the integration of nanoparticles (NPs) can potentially augment the antibacterial effectiveness of resin cement. The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive literature review to assess resin cement's antibacterial effectiveness by incorporating nanoparticles. An extensive search of PubMed and Scopus databases up to September 12, 2023, was conducted to identify relevant scholarly articles that examined and evaluated resin cement's antibacterial effectiveness with and without the incorporation of nanoparticles (NPs). This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for reporting the results. The search retrieved seven eligible studies. Studies indicated that resin cement with NPs significantly reduced the colony forming unit (CFU) counts compared to resin cement without NPs. Furthermore, resin cement, in addition to NPs, significantly reduced the bacterial metabolic activity compared to the control group. The use of nanoparticles (NPs) in resin cement has been shown to enhance its antibacterial properties, possibly mitigating the occurrence of secondary caries. Future clinical trials are required to validate the beneficial effects of NPs in conjunction with resin cement in the prevention of secondary caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.