ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Diagnosis and treatment experience of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: A multicenter retrospective study in China.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia diagnosed by next-generation sequencing: An observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Rapid detection of Chlamydia Psittaci by isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification assays.Poultry science · 2026Article
- A novel risk stratification model based on creatine kinase and direct bilirubin for identifying severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: a double-center, hypothesis-generating retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical management and pharmaceutical care of severeFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Hearing loss as the initial manifestation ofIDCases · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Management of SevereInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Clinical Features of 186 Cases ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Successful azithromycin treatment ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Review
- A case report of spherical pneumonia caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Epidemiological characteristics and environmental surveillance of human psittacosis in Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China (2021-2024).Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Clinical characterization ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Severe Disease in 57 Cases ofInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia: a single-center, retrospective study over 5 years.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Psittacosis pneumonia with the reversed halo sign: a case report and literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Severe Factors of 47 Cases of Psittacosis.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- Case Report: Severe psittacosis in an elderly patient without avian exposure: diagnosis via metagenomic next-generation sequencing and rapid response to doxycycline.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, clinical cases of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia have gradually increased. Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia can quickly progress to severe pneumonia, leading to respiratory failure. Chlamydia psittaci cannot be detected by commonly used detection methods, leading to difficulties in clinical diagnosis and treatment, which may eventually develop into severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. Therefore, we should improve our diagnostic and treatment capabilities for this disease.
methodsThis article retrospectively studied 61 cases of pneumonia from 12 different provinces in China, and classified them into severe pneumonia and non-severe pneumonia. Divided into two groups, with 23 cases of severe pneumonia and 38 cases of non-severe pneumonia. We compared the two groups in terms of imaging, laboratory testing, treatment, prognosis, etc., hoping to provide better explanations and help clinical physicians better diagnose the disease.
resultsThere is no difference in age, gender, contact history, smoking history, or basic disease between severe and non-severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. The most prominent symptom is fever, with a median body temperature of 39.7 ℃, and other symptoms similar to common respiratory infections. White blood cells and neutrophils may not show significant elevation, but C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) will both show significant elevation, often accompanied by a decrease in arterial oxygen pressure. Some patients may experience liver and kidney dysfunction, but there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Doxycycline remains the preferred drug for severe Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia. The imaging mainly shows consolidation and bronchial inflation sign, and may also present with pleural effusion.
conclusionsThe imaging of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia usually shows consolidation with bronchial inflation sign, which can also be manifested as ground glass changes or solid masses. Atypical images are prone to misdiagnosis in the early stages. There are some differences in laboratory examination and imaging between severe pneumonia and non-severe pneumonia, which can help identify severe patients in the early stage. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) played an important role in the diagnosis of all cases in this article. Timely treatment has a good prognosis for the disease, and imaging lesions can be completely absorbed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.