ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Four Pillars: A Risk-Targeted Framework for Vericiguat-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Combination Therapy With Beta-Blockers and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors for Cardiovascular Diseases: Focus on Bisoprolol/Ramipril.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Impact of Vericiguat on Ventricular Remodeling in a Pressure-Overload Heart Failure Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nurse-Led, Remote Optimisation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Across Australia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Eligibility of Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure for Vericiguat and Omecamtiv Mecarbil: From Clinical Trials to the Real-World Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Heart Rate Reduction and the Prognosis of Heart Failure Focused on Ivabradine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence for the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is growing. However, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment for HFrEF. This study aimed to evaluate the most effective combination of pharmacological therapy in patients with HFrEF.
methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL up to Feb 2022, to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of pharmacological treatment among adults (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of HFrEF (defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%). The outcomes of interest included all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A random network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework model was employed to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and rank the treatments.
resultsWe included 49 RCTs involving 90,529 participants with HFrEF. For reducing all-cause mortality, the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66). For CV death, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Vericiguat showed the highest efficacy (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90). Regarding reducing HHF, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i as well as the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Ivabradine were equally the most effective (both RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.39).
conclusionThis study provides robust evidence supporting the use of combination therapies in HFrEF management, with newer agents offering incremental benefits when added to established guideline-directed medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.