ArticleScientific reports2024
Blood osmolytes such as sugar can drive brain fluid flows in a poroelastic model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cochlear Aqueduct Advection and Diffusion Inferred from Computed Tomography Imaging with a Bayesian Approach.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- Stretch and flow at the gliovascular interface: High-fidelity modeling of astrocyte endfeet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Dynamics of brain valves: ostensible rectification mechanisms for cerebrospinal fluid flow.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Advection and diffusion in perivascular and extracellular spaces in the brain.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The glymphatic system of fluid flow through brain tissue may clear amyloid-β during sleep and as such underlie the need for sleep. Dysfunctional glymphatic transport has been implicated in pathological conditions ranging from stroke and dementia to psychiatric illnesses. To date, the fastest observed in-vivo brain flows have been reported after the manipulation of blood osmotic pressures. Surprisingly, the brain seems to shrink while receiving more influx. Though influx of an incompressible fluid might expand the tissue, no physical theory for these observations has been proposed. We here present a minimal mathematical model of brain pressure, deformation, and fluid flows due to vascular osmotic pressures. The model is based on Darcy flow, linear poroelasticity theory and conservation of mass. We propose that a screened Poisson equation holds for interstitial pressure because vascular filtration corresponds to fluid divergence. The model resolves the apparent paradox of combined fluid influx with tissue shrinkage by showing that fluid absorption into the blood can drive both. In this model, small glucose concentration differences between plasma and brain can drive brain flow velocities observed in recent in-vivo assays. Osmosis may therefore drive brain fluid flow under physiological conditions and provide an explanation for the known correlations between diabetes and dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.