ArticleScientific reports2024
Crop classification in the middle reaches of the Hei River based on model transfer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crop classification using remote sensing technology is highly important for monitoring agricultural resources and managing water usage, especially in water-scarce regions like the Hei River. Crop classification requires a substantial number of labeled samples, but the collection of labeled samples demands significant resources and sample data may not be available for some years. To classify crops in sample-free years in the middle reaches of the Hei River, we generated multisource spectral data (MSSD) based on a spectral library and sample data. We pre-trained a model using labeled samples, followed by fine-tuning the model with MSSD to complete the crop classification for the years without samples. We conduct experiments using three CNN-based deep learning models and a machine learning model (RF). The experimental results indicate that in the model transfer experiments, using a fine-tuned model yields accurate classification results, with overall accuracy exceeding 90%. When the amount of labeled sample data is limited, fine-tuning the model based on MSSD can enhance the accuracy of crop classification. Overall, fine-tuning models based on MSSD can significantly enhance the accuracy of model transfer and reduce the reliance of deep learning models on large-scale sample datasets. The method to classify crops in the middle reaches of the Hei River can provide data support for local resource utilization and policy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.