Trial reportMusculoskeletal care2024
Diagnostic Concordance Between Physiotherapist and Emergency Physicians for Patients With a Musculoskeletal Disorder in the Emergency Department.
Trial report in Musculoskeletal care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and management concordance between chiropractors and neurosurgeons for patients with low back pain.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a musculoskeletal disorder. In consequence, some hospitals have integrated autonomous management of musculoskeletal disorders by physiotherapists after triage. Although potential benefits were demonstrated, few studies have examined the agreement between physiotherapists' and emergency physicians' diagnosis. A better understanding of diagnostic concordance between physiotherapists and emergency physicians could inform the implementation of this care model. METHODS AND
findingsSecondary analysis of data obtained through a pilot pragmatic randomised clinical trial. Data from patients presenting a minor musculoskeletal disorder managed by a physiotherapist and an emergency physician were used. Diagnostic concordance was examined using raw agreement and Gwet's first-order agreement coefficient. Thirty-six participants were assessed by both professionals (36.8 ± 18.2 years; W: 55.6%). Overall raw agreement was 86.1% and the diagnostic concordance was almost perfect (Gwet's AC1: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.69-0.98). The most common disagreement was when physiotherapists suspected a bone fracture or contusion, whereas emergency physicians diagnosed a ligament or meniscus disorder.
conclusionsOur results show excellent diagnostic concordance between physiotherapists and emergency physicians, thus supporting the safety of physiotherapy care in the ED. More studies are needed to confirm these results with a larger variety of diagnoses and age strata.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.