ArticleScientific reports2024
High-precision monitoring and prediction of mining area surface subsidence using SBAS-InSAR and CNN-BiGRU-attention model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on Benggang identification and deformation monitoring based on optical and Radar data.PloS one · 2026Article
- IoT-driven smart assistive communication system for the hearing impaired with hybrid deep learning models for sign language recognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact Localization System of CFRP Structure Based on EFPI Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coal mining-induced surface subsidence can significantly impact resident safety and hinder regional sustainable development, making precise subsidence monitoring and prediction critical. Existing mining subsidence monitoring technologies often exhibit low spatiotemporal resolution, while subsidence prediction models suffer from heavy dependence on data quality and model assumptions, as well as imprecise parameters. This study addresses these limitations by proposing a novel mining subsidence monitoring and prediction method based on Small Baseline Subset Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SBAS-InSAR) and the Convolutional Neural Network-Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit-Attention (CNN-BiGRU-Attention) model. Focusing on the Banji mining area in Anhui Province, ground subsidence was monitored from July 15, 2021, to September 3, 2023, utilizing SBAS-InSAR technology with Sentinel-1A satellite data. The monitoring results were validated using leveling measurement data. A CNN-BiGRU-Attention prediction model was subsequently constructed based on the time-series monitoring data. The results indicate that the surface subsidence rate in the study area decreases progressively from northwest to southeast, with an average subsidence rate ranging from -49.844 mm/year to -14.810 mm/year. At feature points, the CNN-BiGRU-Attention model effectively captures the characteristics of subsidence time-series changes. For regional subsidence prediction, this model maintains the smallest error, with Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values of 1.27 mm and 1.44 mm, respectively, and an absolute prediction error of less than 1 mm in most areas. This study integrates SBAS-InSAR technology with the CNN-BiGRU-Attention model to enable unmanned monitoring and prediction of mining subsidence. In comparison to traditional methods, this approach not only reduces monitoring costs but also enhances the accuracy of subsidence predictions, offering critical technical support for the sustainable development of mining areas.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.