ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced power system stabilizer tuning using marine predator algorithm with comparative analysis and real time validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study concentrates on the implementation of Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA) scheme for tuning of a power system stabilizer's (PSS's) parameters to damp the low-frequency oscillations in a power system. To this, the single machine infinite bus system (SMIB), the Western System Coordinating Council (WSCC) and the New England 10 machine 39-bus power system are utilized for testing and comparing different metaheuristic algorithms using different fitness functions. Optimal PSS parameters of SMIB test system are validated using CU-SLRT Std, a real-time digital simulator. The comparative studies demonstrate that the MPA optimized PSS yields improvements of up to 98.62% in the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) at 69.42%, Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) at 71.79%, Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) at 72.39%, African vulture optimization algorithm (AVOA) at 78.04%, Wild Horse Optimization (WHO) algorithm at 68.57% under various operating scenarios. The superiority of the MPA optimized PSS has been validated using Hardware-in-the-loop implementation for the SMIB test system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.