ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Deep reinforcement learning extracts the optimal sepsis treatment policy from treatment records.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes for High-Dimensional Accelerated Failure Time Model.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Equity-Preserving Public Health Resource Allocation Using Multi-Objective Safe Reinforcement Learning: Evidence from Thailand.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Large language model-augmented offline reinforcement learning framework for sepsis management in critical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Optimization of glucocorticoid administration in patients with sepsis using reinforcement learning: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Proposing a novel ABCDEF framework for managing critical illness in geriatrics: challenges and perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Dosage Calculations.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Current Perspectives on the Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Medicine.Anesthesiology clinics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is one of the most life-threatening medical conditions. Therefore, many clinical trials have been conducted to identify optimal treatment strategies for sepsis. However, finding reliable strategies remains challenging due to limited-scale clinical tests. Here we tried to extract the optimal sepsis treatment policy from accumulated treatment records.
methodsIn this study, with our modified deep reinforcement learning algorithm, we stably generated a patient treatment artificial intelligence model. As training data, 16,744 distinct admissions in tertiary hospitals were used and tested with separate datasets. Model performance was tested by t test and visualization of estimated survival rates. We also analyze model behavior using the confusion matrix, important feature extraction by a random forest decision tree, and treatment behavior comparison to understand how our treatment model achieves high performance.
resultsHere we show that our treatment model's policy achieves a significantly higher estimated survival rate (up to 10.03%). We also show that our models' vasopressor treatment was quite different from that of physicians. Here, we identify that blood urea nitrogen, age, sequential organ failure assessment score, and shock index are the most different factors in dealing with sepsis patients between our model and physicians.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the patient treatment model can extract potential optimal sepsis treatment policy. We also extract core information about sepsis treatment by analyzing its policy. These results may not apply directly in clinical settings because they were only tested on a database. However, they are expected to serve as important guidelines for further research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.