Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578542›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Deep reinforcement learning extracts the optimal sepsis treatment policy from treatment records.

Yunho Choi, Songmi Oh, Jin Won Huh, Ho-Taek Joo, Hosu Lee, Wonsang You, Cheng-Mok Bae, Jae-Hun Choi, Kyung-Joong Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yunho ChoiSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea.
Songmi OhSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0532-1386
Jin Won HuhPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Taek JooSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea.
Hosu LeeDepartment of Control and Robot Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-daero, Jinju-si, 52828, Republic of Korea.
Wonsang YouSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea.
Cheng-Mok BaeSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Hun ChoiMedical Information Lab, Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 218 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34129, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Joong KimSchool of Integrated Technology, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Chemdan-gwa-gi-ro, Gwangju, 61005, Republic of Korea. kjkim@gist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7732-0817

Funding

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) 2021-0-00982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is one of the most life-threatening medical conditions. Therefore, many clinical trials have been conducted to identify optimal treatment strategies for sepsis. However, finding reliable strategies remains challenging due to limited-scale clinical tests. Here we tried to extract the optimal sepsis treatment policy from accumulated treatment records.

methodsIn this study, with our modified deep reinforcement learning algorithm, we stably generated a patient treatment artificial intelligence model. As training data, 16,744 distinct admissions in tertiary hospitals were used and tested with separate datasets. Model performance was tested by t test and visualization of estimated survival rates. We also analyze model behavior using the confusion matrix, important feature extraction by a random forest decision tree, and treatment behavior comparison to understand how our treatment model achieves high performance.

resultsHere we show that our treatment model's policy achieves a significantly higher estimated survival rate (up to 10.03%). We also show that our models' vasopressor treatment was quite different from that of physicians. Here, we identify that blood urea nitrogen, age, sequential organ failure assessment score, and shock index are the most different factors in dealing with sepsis patients between our model and physicians.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that the patient treatment model can extract potential optimal sepsis treatment policy. We also extract core information about sepsis treatment by analyzing its policy. These results may not apply directly in clinical settings because they were only tested on a database. However, they are expected to serve as important guidelines for further research.

Identifiers

PMID39578542
PMCPMC11584651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.