Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative analysis of YOLO models for green coffee bean detection and defect classification.

Hira Lal Gope, Hidekazu Fukai, Fahim Mahafuz Ruhad, Shohag Barman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hira Lal GopeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh. hlgope@sau.ac.bd.
Hidekazu FukaiDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193, Gifu, Japan. fukai.hidekazu.r3@f.gifu-u.ac.jp.
Fahim Mahafuz RuhadDepartment of Agricultural Construction and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet-3100, Bangladesh. mahafuzfahim@gmail.com.
Shohag BarmanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Pirojpur-8500, Bangladesh. shohag3340csecu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality and uniformity of green coffee beans significantly influence the overall flavor and value of the product. In the coffee industry, automated flaws and bean-type identification offer numerous advantages. This study examines the effectiveness of multiple YOLO (You Only Look Once) models for identifying and classifying green coffee beans. Various YOLO variants, including YOLOv3, YOLOv4, YOLOv5, YOLOv7, YOLOv8, and custom models, are compared with a focus on computational efficiency, accuracy, and speed. Utilizing a dataset of 4,032 training and 506 testing images encompassing diverse bean types, defects, and lighting conditions, we assessed the performance. The bounding boxes generated by our models accurately encompass coffee beans, with the background typically uniform and set to black. Our analysis reveals the superior performance of the custom-YOLOv8n model, which we meticulously customized for green coffee bean detection. This model achieved high precision, recall, f1-score, and mAP, demonstrating its potential for real-world implementation in coffee bean quality control systems. The customization process involved fine-tuning the model to focus on significant features relevant to green coffee bean detection and employing specific labeling strategies. Customization allows you to fine-tune the model to focus on important features relevant to green coffee bean detection. This sensitivity ensures that the model can effectively distinguish between different bean types and detect even subtle defects. This paper clarifies our primary objective of evaluating YOLO models' performance in identifying and categorizing green coffee beans, with potential implications for enhancing efficiency and consistency in the coffee industry. A succinct key sentence underscores the benefits of our research for readers seeking efficient YOLO model selection and implementation in agricultural systems.

Indexed as

CoffeaCoffeeQuality ControlSeedsCoffeeAnalysisand Evaluation metricsClassificationCoffee beanCustom-YOLOv8nDefectDetection

Identifiers

PMID39578522
PMCPMC11584854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.