Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578449›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A stepwise mode of TGFβ-SMAD signaling and DNA methylation regulates naïve-to-primed pluripotency and differentiation.

Bingnan Zhao, Xiuwei Yu, Jintong Shi, Shuangyu Ma, Shizhao Li, Haitao Shi, Shoubing Xia, Youqiong Ye, Yongchun Zhang, Yanhua Du and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epigenetic editing of marine medaka (Zoological research · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Coupling of stemness maintenance with cell cycle control in stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bingnan Zhao *Department of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiuwei Yu *Department of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jintong Shi *Shanghai Institute of Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shuangyu Ma *Department of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shizhao Li *Department of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-1450
Haitao ShiDepartment of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shoubing XiaDepartment of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Youqiong YeShanghai Institute of Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8332-4710
Yongchun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. yongchun_zhang@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID 0009-0009-9949-0604
Yanhua DuShanghai Institute of Immunology, State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related Genes, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. yhdu@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5670-4723
Qiong WangDepartment of Histoembryology, Genetics and Developmental Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory of Cell Differentiation and Apoptosis of Chinese Ministry of Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. wangqiong@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-2223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of transcription regulatory complexes by the association of Smad4 with Smad2 and Smad3 (Smad2/3) is crucial in the canonical TGFβ pathway. Although the central requirement of Smad4 as a common mediator is emphasized in regulating TGFβ signaling, it is not obligatory for all responses. The role of Smad2/3 independently of Smad4 remains understudied. Here, we introduce a stepwise paradigm in which Smad2/3 regulate the lineage priming and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) by collaboration with different effectors. During the naïve-to-primed transition, Smad2/3 upregulate DNA methyltransferase 3b (Dnmt3b), which establishes the proper DNA methylation patterns and, in turn, enables Smad2/3 binding to the hypomethylated centers of promoters and enhancers of epiblast marker genes. Consequently, in the absence of Smad2/3, Smad4 alone cannot initiate epiblast-specific gene transcription. When primed epiblast cells begin to differentiate, Dnmt3b becomes less actively engaged in global genome methylation, and Smad4 takes over the baton in this relay race, forming a complex with Smad2/3 to support mesendoderm induction. Thus, mESCs lacking Smad4 can undergo the priming process but struggle with the downstream differentiation. This work sheds light on the intricate mechanisms underlying TGFβ signaling and its role in cellular processes.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationDNA Methyltransferase 3BMouse Embryonic Stem CellsSignal TransductionSmad2 ProteinSmad3 ProteinTransforming Growth Factor betaAnimalsGerm LayersMicePluripotent Stem CellsPromoter Regions, GeneticSmad4 ProteinDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA Methyltransferase 3BSmad2 ProteinSmad2 protein, mouseSmad3 ProteinSmad3 protein, mouseSmad4 ProteinSmad4 protein, mouseTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID39578449
PMCPMC11584862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.