ReviewFuture science OA2024
Comparative analysis of TPVB and ESPB for postoperative pain management in thoracic and breast surgeries.
Review in Future science OA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of sympathetic block and hemodynamic effects of erector spinae plane block and thoracic epidural analgesia in breast surgery: a randomised controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- A narrative review on fascial plane blocks - Part B: Clinical applications, practical considerations, and future directions.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Review
- Application of nerve blocks in breast surgery: evolution and prospects from efficacy comparison to multidimensional assessment and precision application.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Analgesic Techniques in Thoracoscopic Lung Resection Patients.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of erector spinae block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) for managing postoperative pain in thoracic and breast surgeries.
designData from 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2019 and 2022 were included, and selected based on stringent criteria.
settingThe RCTs were conducted across various clinical settings, including operating theaters worldwide. PATIENTS: The analysis involved 844 patients undergoing thoracic or breast surgery under regional anesthesia, representing diverse health statuses.
interventionsPatients received either PVB or ESPB, typically guided by ultrasound, for postoperative pain control. MAIN
findingsPVB demonstrated superior pain management during rest and mobility, requiring fewer additional analgesics than ESPB. Incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and opioid consumption did not differ significantly between the methods. ESPB showed more effective block placement.
conclusionPVB is preferred for reducing analgesic requirements and managing postoperative pain, especially during rest and activity. ESPB offers advantages in block placement. Surgical type and patient preferences should guide the choice between PVB and ESPB, necessitating further research for optimized clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.