Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578372›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2025

Cesarean Section, Childhood Health, and Schooling: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From Denmark, Norway and Sweden.

Jessica Á Rogvi, Aline Bütikofer, Lone Krebs, Hanna Mühlrad, Miriam Wüst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica Á RogviDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Aline BütikoferDepartment of Economics, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway.
Lone KrebsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Hanna MühlradThe Institute for Evaluation of Labor Market and Education Policy (IFAU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Miriam WüstDepartment of Economics, CEBI, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7171-7146

Funding

Danmarks GrundforskningsfondNorges ForskningsrådSwedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being one of the most common surgical procedures in industrialized countries, there is limited causal evidence on the long-term consequences of Cesarean section (CS). We study the impacts of CS on health during ages 1-12 years and human capital outcomes at age 16 years, using exogenous variation in the probability of receiving a CS for breech births at term-a group with high CS risk. We use administrative data from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden to show that preventing complicated vaginal births benefits health at birth and reduces the number of all-cause hospital nights during childhood. Our findings for childhood diagnoses for asthma, allergies, diabetes mellitus type 1, and school outcomes are imprecise and do thus not lend strong support for prominent hypotheses on CS causing long-term immune dysfunction disorders and, thereby, worse human capital outcomes.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionChild HealthEducational StatusAdolescentBreech PresentationChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkFemaleHumansInfantMaleNorwayPregnancySwedenbreech birthscesarean sectionlong‐term outcomesmedical procedure useregression discontinuity design

Identifiers

PMID39578372
PMCPMC11786937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.