ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Peripherally inserted central venous catheter in outpatient antibiotic spinal infection treatment is safe, effective and leads to significant reduction in healthcare expenses.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Suppressive antibiotic therapy for spinal hardware infection: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Construction of a home-based self-management program for patients with indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter based on the IMB model.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolonged antibiotic therapy is often recommended for the treatment of spinal infections. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for spinal neurosurgery patients with spondylodiscitis. We carried out a retrospective study involving 67 patients who were administered peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for IV antibiotic treatment from January 2020 to December 2022. We assessed patient data concerning infections and neurosurgical concerns. Each patient underwent a minimum of 6 weeks of IV antibiotics, both as inpatients and outpatients. The study included 67 patients with a median age of 61 years (SD +/- 14.18 years), with approximately 44% being female. The average hospital stay for inpatient treatment was 20 days (SD +/- 8.8 days). Subsequent outpatient antibiotic therapy lasted an average of 70.32 days (SD +/- 18.24 days), with outpatient IV therapy accounting for 44.74 days (SD +/- 9.15 days). The most common pathogens identified were Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiological analysis did not detect any pathogens in 18% of patients. Radiographic and laboratory evidence of spondylodiscitis was absent in 99% of patients during the final follow-up. No catheter-related complications occurred. Outpatient IV antibiotic therapy using a PICC line catheter is a safe and effective treatment option for spinal infections, especially in elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.