Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578268›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

The use of the psoas-to-lumbar vertebrae index and modified frailty index in predicting postoperative complications in degenerative spine surgery: can sarcopenia or frailty be underestimated?

Alberto Ruffilli, Marco Manzetti, Giovanni Viroli, Matteo Traversari, Marco Ialuna, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alessandro Cargeli, Cesare Faldini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto Ruffilli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco Manzetti1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. marco.manzetti@ior.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3992-9637
Giovanni Viroli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Matteo Traversari1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Marco Ialuna1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Manuele Morandi Guaitoli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro Cargeli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Cesare Faldini1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDegenerative spine disease (DSD) is increasingly prevalent due to aging populations, leading to higher surgical interventions and associated complications. This necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment, evaluating frailty through tools such as the modified Frailty Index 5 and modified Frailty Index 11 (mFI-5 and mFI-11). Despite the utility of mFI-5 and mFI-11 in predicting postoperative complications, these indices do not account for sarcopenia, a syndrome related to but distinct from frailty, which is associated with higher complication rates. This paper aims to retrospectively evaluate the influence of sarcopenia and frailty on postoperative adverse events in a cohort of patients who underwent posterior spine fusion for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

methodsA retrospective review of 286 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine fusion for DSD was conducted. Frailty was measured using mFI-5 and mFI-11, while sarcopenia was assessed through Psoas to Lumbar Vertebral Index (PLVI) on magnetic resonance images. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications within 30 days. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate models to determine the predictors of complications.

resultsHigher frailty scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative complications (p < .05). However, sarcopenia showed no significant correlation with postoperative complications rates, except for pneumological complications (p = .031). Multivariate analysis confirmed frailty as a strong independent predictor of postoperative complications, while sarcopenia had limited impact.

conclusionFrailty is a robust predictor of postoperative complications in DSD surgeries, while sarcopenia, appears to play a lesser role. The findings suggest that frailty alone provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk than sarcopenia.

Indexed as

FrailtyLumbar VertebraePostoperative ComplicationsSarcopeniaSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsoas MusclesRetrospective StudiesDegenerative SpineFrailtyFrailty IndexOutcomesPLVISarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.