Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578267›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025

Real-world rates and risk factors for subsequent treatment with vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty after initial vertebral augmentation: a retrospective cohort study.

Joshua A Hirsch, Christopher Gilligan, Ronil V Chandra, Allan Brook, Nicolas C Gasquet, Christine N Ricker, Charlotte Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua A HirschDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. jahirsch@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-8798
Christopher GilliganOffice of the Chief Medical and Quality Officer, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ronil V ChandraDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Monash Medical Centre and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Allan BrookDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Nicolas C GasquetMedtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christine N RickerMedtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Charlotte WuMedtronic, Plc, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world incidence and predictors of additional vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty after initial vertebral augmentation, as a proxy for subsequent symptomatic vertebral fracture. Of patients, 15.5% underwent subsequent vertebral augmentation. The patient's comorbidities are strongly associated with risk of subsequent treatment. PURPOSE: To determine the real-world incidence and predictors of additional vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty after initial vertebral augmentation, as a proxy for subsequent symptomatic and disabling vertebral fracture.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using commercial insurance claims data (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database). Adult patients who underwent subsequent treatment for vertebral fracture within 24 months of initial balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) or vertebroplasty (VP) were classified into "subsequent treatment" or "no subsequent treatment" cohorts. Survival analysis was applied to investigate the effect of risk factors on subsequent treatment.

resultsBetween 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2020, a total of 32,513 adult patients underwent a BKP/VP procedure following a diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture in the preceding 12 months. Five thousand thirty-five patients (15.5%) underwent a subsequent BKP/VP treatment within 2 years; 90% had a single fracture level treated. An increased hazard of subsequent treatment was associated with a number of fractures treated at initial BKP/VP (≥ 4 levels, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.68 (95% CI 1.24-2.26); steroid use, AHR 1.9 (95% CI 1.31-1.48); Elixhauser Comorbidity Index ≥ 4, AHR 1.44 (95% CI 1.17-1.77); and multiple myeloma, AHR 1.31 (95% CI 1.13-1.53)). Age < 70 years was associated with reduced hazard of subsequent treatment (AHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89).

conclusionsOne in seven patients underwent subsequent treatment for vertebral fracture after initial vertebral augmentation. Baseline patient characteristics were associated with increased risk of subsequent fracture within 2 years, suggesting that a patient's natural history is strongly associated with risk of subsequent treatment rather than the initial surgical procedure itself.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionKyphoplastyOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesVertebroplastyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesBalloon kyphoplastyOsteoporosisSubsequent fractureVertebral augmentationVertebral compression fractureVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID39578267
PMCPMC11706842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.