ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Accuracy of an nnUNet Neural Network for the Automatic Segmentation of Intracranial Aneurysms, Their Parent Vessels, and Major Cerebral Arteries from MRI-TOF.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multicenter study of automatic segmentation-based multimodal fusion integrating radiomics, deep learning, and clinical parameters for prostate cancer detection.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Automated deep learning-based segmentation and volumetric analysis of meningiomas.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Uncertainty-aware automated labeling of intracranial arteries using deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe automatic recognition of intracraial aneurysms by means of machine-learning algorithms represents a new frontier for diagnostic and therapeutic goals. Yet, the current algorithms focus solely on the aneurysms and not on the recognition of their parent vessels. The purpose of the present study is the development of a new machine-learning algorithm for fully automatic identification of cerebral arteries and intracranial aneurysms (IAs) based on a manually segmented MRA-TOF data set. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 62 MRA-TOF scans of a total of 73 untreated, unruptured IAs were manually color-labeled in 21 classes. A nnUNet architecture was trained on MRA-TOF images. The performance of the automatic segmentation was compared with the manual segmentation by using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Centerline Dice (ClDice), and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95). Sensitivity was computed for aneurysm detection.
resultsAcross all 21 classes, the median DSC was 0.86 [95% CI: 0.81-0.89], the median ClDice was 0.91 [0.85, 0.94], and the median HD95 was 2.9 [1.0, 14.9] mm. Sensitivity of the model for aneurysm detection was 0.8. For this class specifically, a median DSC of 0.88 [0.13, 0.92], median ClDice of 0.89 [0.06, 1.0], and median HD95 of 1.8 [0.58, 81] mm was achieved. The volume of the labeled anatomic structure was the most relevant determinant of accuracy in this model. Median time to predict was 130.6 [60.9, 284.1] seconds.
conclusionsThe nnUNet MRA-TOF-based algorithm provided a fast and adequate automatic extraction of unruptured IAs, their parent vessels, and the most relevant cerebral arteries. Future steps involve the expansion of the training set with the inclusion of more MRA-TOF studies with and without IAs and its incorporation in 3D imaging viewers and treatment prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.