Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39578051›Full record

ReviewACS nano2024

Mass Production of Graphene Oxide Beyond the Laboratory: Bridging the Gap Between Academic Research and Industry.

Yuta Nishina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yuta NishinaResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Okayama University 3-1-1, Tsushimanaka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japn, 700-8530.ORCID 0000-0002-4958-1753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mass production of graphene oxide (GO) has garnered significant attention in recent years due to its potential applications in various fields, from materials science to biomedicine. Graphene, known for its unique properties, such as high conductivity and mechanical strength, has been extensively studied. However, traditional production methods such as the exfoliation of graphite with scotch tape are not suitable for large-scale production. This has led to an increased focus on GO as a viable alternative to graphene production. Nonetheless, challenges, including the optimization of oxidation processes, the control of structural uniformity, and the reproducibility of production, have not been solved so far. This review critically examines GO production advancements by analyzing experimental and mechanistic studies to identify significant developments that enable high-yield and reproducible methods suitable for industrial-scale production. Special attention is given to oxidation techniques and postsynthesis purification and storage, with a focus on controlled oxidation to achieve homogeneous and single-layer GO. Through this lens, the review outlines the path forward for the industrialization of GO, aiming to bridge the gap between academic research and industrial production.

Indexed as

Chemical oxidationElectrochemical oxidationGraphene oxideGraphiteIndustrializationMass productionOptimizationPurificationSafetyStability

Identifiers

PMID39578051
PMCPMC11636258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.