Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39577502›Full record

Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2025

Brain structural connectomic topology predicts medication response in youth with bipolar disorder: A randomized clinical trial.

Du Lei, Kun Qin, Wenbin Li, Walter H L Pinaya, Maxwell J Tallman, Jingbo Zhang, L Rodrigo Patino, Jeffrey R Strawn, David E Fleck, Christina C Klein and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Du LeiCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA; Key Laboratory of Major Brain Disease and Aging Research(Ministry of Education), Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China. Electronic address: alien18@163.com.
Kun QinDepartment of Radiology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Wenbin LiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA; Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Walter H L PinayaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK.
Maxwell J TallmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Jingbo ZhangCollege of Medical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
L Rodrigo PatinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Jeffrey R StrawnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
David E FleckDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Christina C KleinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Qiyong GongHuaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, The Center for Medical Imaging, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Caleb M AdlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.
Andrea MechelliDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
John A SweeneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA; Huaxi MR Research Center (HMRRC), Department of Radiology, The Center for Medical Imaging, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Melissa P DelBelloDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati 45219, OH, USA.

Funding

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Treatment Effects in Adolescent ManiaR01MH080973 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI DELBELLO, MELISSA P · 2009 to 2013
$3.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse to pharmacotherapy varies considerably among youths with bipolar disorder (BD) and is poorly predicted by clinical or demographic features. It can take several weeks to determine whether medication for BD is clinically effective. Although neuroimaging biomarkers are promising predictors, few studies examined the predictive value of the brain connectomic topology.

methodsBD-I youth (N = 121) with no prior psychopharmacotherapy were randomized to 6-weeks of double-blind quetiapine or lithium. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed before medication and at one week after medication initiation. Brain structural connectome was established from the MRI scans, and topological metrics were calculated for each patient. Deep learning-based prediction model was built using baseline and one-week connectome topology to predict medication response at week 6.

resultsBoth baseline topological metrics and one-week topological changes could predict treatment response with significant accuracy (73.8 % - 86.8 %). A longitudinally joint model combining baseline and one-week topology provided the highest accuracy (91.3 %). The transferability between models for quetiapine and lithium was relatively poor. In addition, predictions for the two drugs were driven by similar baseline but distinct one-week salient topological patterns. LIMITATIONS: Independent replication is needed to validate our preliminary findings.

conclusionBrain structural connectomic topology at baseline and its acute changes within the first week enable accurate BD medication response prediction. The most contributive brain regions differed between prediction models for quetiapine and lithium after one week. These findings provide preliminary evidence for the development of neuroimaging-based biomarkers for guiding therapeutic interventions in youth with BD.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBipolar DisorderBrainConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingQuetiapine FumarateAdolescentAntimanic AgentsChildDeep LearningDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsQuetiapine FumarateAntipsychoticsBipolar disorderGraph theoryLithiumMachine learningMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID39577502
PMCPMC11647949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.