Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39577248›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2024

Speech perception and language comprehension in primary progressive aphasia.

Heather R Dial, Rachel Tessmer, Maya L Henry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heather R DialDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Electronic address: hrdial@central.uh.edu.
Rachel TessmerDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Maya L HenryDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Establishing Evidence-based Treatment for Speech and Language in Primary Progressive AphasiaR01DC016291 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HENRY, MAYA · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Investigating Neural Signatures of Rehabilitation in Primary Progressive AphasiaF32DC016812 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DIAL, HEATHER R · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016812NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive loss of speech and language. Although speech perception and language comprehension deficits are observed in individuals with PPA, these deficits have been understudied relative to production deficits. Recent work has examined receptive language processing at sublexical, lexical, and semantic levels in PPA; however, systematic investigation of these levels of processing within a single PPA cohort is lacking. The current study sought to fill this gap. Individuals with logopenic, nonfluent, and semantic variants of PPA and healthy, age-matched controls completed minimal pairs syllable discrimination, auditory lexical decision, and picture-word verification tasks to assess sublexical, lexical, and semantic processing. Distinct profiles were observed across PPA variants. Individuals with logopenic variant PPA had impaired performance on auditory lexical decision and picture-word verification tasks, with a trend toward impaired performance on the syllable discrimination task. Individuals with nonfluent and semantic variant PPA had impaired performance only on auditory lexical decision and picture-word verification. Evaluation of the types of errors made on the picture-word verification task (phonological and semantic) provided further insight into levels of deficits across the variants. Overall, the results indicate deficits in receptive processing at the lexical-phonological, lexical-semantic, and semantic levels in logopenic variant PPA, with a trend toward impaired sublexical processing. Deficits were observed at the lexical-semantic and semantic levels in semantic variant PPA, and lexical-phonological deficits were observed in nonfluent PPA, likely reflecting changes both in lexical-phonological processing as well as changes in predictive coding during perception. This study provides a more precise characterization of the linguistic profile of each PPA subtype for speech perception and language comprehension. The constellation of deficits observed in each PPA subtype holds promise for differential diagnosis and for informing models of intervention.

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveComprehensionLanguageSpeech PerceptionAgedFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsSemanticsAuditory comprehensionLexicalPrimary progressive aphasiaSpeech perceptionSublexical

Identifiers

PMID39577248
PMCPMC12974948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.