Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576965›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2025

MRD-driven phase 2 study of daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Manisha Bhutani, Myra Robinson, David Foureau, Shebli Atrash, Barry Paul, Fei Guo, Jason M Grayson, Anna Ivanina-Foureau, Mauricio Pineda-Roman, Cindy Varga and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04113018 (LCI-HEM-MYE-KRdD-001), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04113018 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

LCI-HEM-MYE-KRdD-001: Phase II Study of Daratumumab Combined With Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2020 to 2027Enrolled39ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsCarfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRd) + Daratumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Manisha BhutaniDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-9019-7438
Myra RobinsonDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-6933-889X
David FoureauDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-8356
Shebli AtrashDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-7534
Barry PaulDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.
Fei GuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.
Jason M GraysonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Anna Ivanina-FoureauDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-5701-2174
Mauricio Pineda-RomanDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-0028-3720
Cindy VargaDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.
Reed FriendDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0982-2345
Christopher J FerreriDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.
Xhevahire BegicClinical Trials Office, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC.
Sarah NorekClinical Trials Office, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC.
Tiffany DrennanClinical Trials Office, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC.
Michelle B AndersonDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC.
James T SymanowskiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC.
Peter M VoorheesDepartment of Hematologic Oncology and Blood Disorders, Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-1661-718X
Saad Z UsmaniMyeloma Service, Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractIn newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), measurable residual disease (MRD) status is prognostically important, but its role in treatment decisions remains unclear. In a phase 2 trial, we assessed daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-KRd) induction followed by a next-generation sequencing-based MRD-adapted strategy. The primary outcome was complete response (CR) and stringent CR (≥CR) after induction. Flow cytometry was used to profile T cells. Among 39 patients, 21 (54%) achieved ≥CR after induction (P = .375), with MRD-negative rates of 59% (10-5) and 41% (10-6). Patients who were MRD-negative (n = 24, group A) received lenalidomide maintenance, showing sustained MRD negativity in 14 of 18 (77.8%) for ≥12 cycles. MRD-positive transplant-eligible patients (n = 8, group B) underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, with 62.5% converting to MRD-negative at 10-5 (37.5% at 10-6) posttransplant. MRD-positive, transplant-ineligible patients (n = 4, group C) received KRd consolidation. Best MRD-negative rates improved to 77% (10-5) and 72% (10-6). No new safety concerns were identified for Dara-KRd. With a median follow-up of 30.1 months, 3, 2, and 1 patient(s) in groups A, B, and C, respectively, have progressed or died. We observed that Dara-KRd strongly activated memory T cells, which was associated with an MRD-negative state post induction. Although the primary outcome was not met, Dara-KRd induction in NDMM achieved high ≥CR and MRD-negative rates without new safety concerns. The post induction MRD-adapted strategy deepened responses in MRD-positive patients and maintained durable MRD control in MRD-negative patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04113018.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedAntibodies, MonoclonalDexamethasoneFemaleHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualOligopeptidesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalcarfilzomibdaratumumabDexamethasoneLenalidomideOligopeptides

Identifiers

PMID39576965
PMCPMC11814523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.