Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576958›Full record

ReviewBlood2025

The contribution of the monocyte-macrophage lineage to immunotherapy outcomes.

Rachael C Adams, Kelli P A MacDonald, Geoffrey R Hill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Monocyte-mediated mechanisms in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: opportunities for early intervention.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Regulatory effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachael C AdamsInfection and Inflammation Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-587X
Kelli P A MacDonaldInfection and Inflammation Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Geoffrey R HillTranslational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.

Funding

VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STEPHANIE J LEE · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
Project 3: Stem Cell Allografts for Lymphoid MalignanciesP01CA078902 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SANDMAIER, BRENDA MARIE · 1999 to 2025
$46.1M
Preventing GVHD by inhibition of alloantigen presentation in the gutR01HL148164 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL, Motoko Koyama · 2019 to 2026
$6.5M
Preventing Myeloma Relapse after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation with Decoy Resistant IL-18U01CA244291 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HILL, GEOFFREY ROGER · 2019 to 2022
$4.2M
Defining Protective CMV Immunity after TransplantationR01AI175535 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Geoffrey Roger HILL · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NCI NIH HHS P01 CA078902NCI NIH HHS U01 CA244291NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL148164NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI175535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMacrophages execute core functions in maintaining tissue homeostasis, in which their extensive plasticity permits a spectrum of functions from tissue remodeling to immune defense. However, perturbations to tissue-resident macrophages during disease, and the subsequent emergence of monocyte-derived macrophages, can hinder tissue recovery and promote further damage through inflammatory and fibrotic programs. Gaining a fundamental understanding of the critical pathways defining pathogenic macrophage populations enables the development of targeted therapeutic approaches to improve disease outcomes. In the setting of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), which remains the major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1)-dependent donor-derived macrophages have been identified as key pathogenic mediators of fibrotic skin and lung disease. Antibody blockade of the CSF1 receptor (CSF1R) to induce macrophage depletion showed remarkable capacity to prevent fibrosis in preclinical models and has subsequently demonstrated impressive efficacy for improving cGVHD in ongoing clinical trials. Similarly, macrophage depletion approaches are currently under investigation for their potential to augment responses to immune checkpoint inhibition. Moreover, both monocyte and tissue-resident macrophage populations have recently been implicated as mediators of the numerous toxicities associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, further highlighting potential avenues of macrophage-based interventions to improve clinical outcomes. Herein, we examine the current literature on basic macrophage biology and contextualize this in the setting of cellular and immunotherapy. Additionally, we highlight mechanisms by which macrophages can be targeted, largely by interfering with the CSF1/CSF1R signaling axis, for therapeutic benefit in the context of both cellular and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Cell LineageGraft vs Host DiseaseImmunotherapyMacrophagesMonocytesAnimalsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMacrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorMacrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID39576958
PMCPMC13639465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.