Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576847›Full record

ReviewCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Health Inequalities in Breast Cancer in England: A Pragmatic Review to Inform National Institute for Care and Excellence (NICE) Recommendations.

Eric Slade, Kirsty Luckham, Andrea Heath, Lesley Owen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric SladeNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4732-0162
Kirsty LuckhamNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.
Andrea HeathNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9195-5632
Lesley OwenNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health inequalities refer to systematic, unfair and avoidable differences in health across the population and between different groups in society. We reviewed health inequalities related to breast cancer to inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations. This was a pragmatic, targeted review to identify examples of health inequalities related to breast cancer in England. The search focused on national cancer registries, screening programme datasets, patient experience surveys and reports from key organisations. The results were synthesised using 5 domains of interest, covering health status, risk factors, wider determinants, access to and quality and experience of care. These domains were subdivided across 4 dimensions of health inequalities, including deprivation, geography, protected characteristics, and inclusion health groups. It was found that although breast cancer is less common in more deprived groups, these groups have worse health outcomes and higher mortality rates compared to less deprived groups. Many disadvantaged groups are less likely to participate in breast cancer screening, leading to delayed diagnosis and more advanced cancers. Behavioural risk factors such as obesity, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption vary across groups and impact breast cancer risks and outcomes. While people from ethnic minority groups have lower breast cancer incidence, evidence suggests that the incidence of breast cancer in some groups is increasing. Ethnic minority groups are also often diagnosed at advanced stages due to presenting through non-screening routes. Low health literacy is an issue for many disadvantaged groups. This review demonstrates that late diagnosis and low screening uptake significantly contribute to health inequalities among different groups, including deprived and ethnic minority groups. There are many gaps in the evidence, and this review further highlights potential research areas for the broader health and care system from the perspective of health inequalities.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factorsbreast cancerbreast cancer outcomesclinical guidelineshealth inequalitiespragmatic review

Identifiers

PMID39576847
PMCPMC11585038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.