Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576804›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in pregnancy: A systematic review.

Alison J Morton, Alexandra Roddy Mitchell, Richard E Melville, Lisa Hui, Steven Y C Tong, Sarah J Dunstan, Justin T Denholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Tuberculosis in Pregnancy: An Updated Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Tuberculosis prevention in children, adolescents, and pregnant and postpartum women in South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison J MortonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3022-6696
Alexandra Roddy MitchellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, At Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9583-2151
Richard E MelvilleVictorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9663-0655
Lisa HuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, At Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Australia.
Steven Y C TongDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-8356
Sarah J DunstanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-933X
Justin T DenholmDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne, At the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9214-6431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy may be associated with risk of developing tuberculosis (TB) in those infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). The perinatal period could provide opportunities for targeted screening and treatment. This study aims to synthesise published literature on Mtb infection in pregnancy, relating to prevalence, natural history, test performance, cascade of care, and treatment. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase+Embase Classic, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on October 3, 2023, and 47 studies met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of Mtb infection was as high as 57.0% in some populations, with rates increasing with maternal age and in women from high TB-incidence settings. Five studies quantified perinatal progression from Mtb infection to active TB disease, with two demonstrating increased risk compared to non-pregnant populations (IRR 1.3-1.4 during pregnancy and IRR 1.9-2 postpartum). Concordance between Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and Interferon Gamma-Release Assay (IGRA) ranged from 49.4%-96.3%, with k-values of 0.19-0.56. High screening adherence was reported, with 62.0-100.0% completing antenatal TST and 81.0-100.0% of those positive having chest radiograph. Four studies of TB preventative treatment (TPT) did not find a significant association with serious adverse events. The antenatal period could provide opportunities for contextualised Mtb infection screening and treatment. As women with increased age and from high TB-incidence settings demonstrate higher prevalence and risk of disease, this cohort should be prioritised. TPT appears safe and feasible; however, further studies are needed to optimise algorithms, ensuring pregnant and postpartum women can make evidence-informed decisions for effective TB prevention.

Identifiers

PMID39576804
PMCPMC11584094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.