Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576802›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Early detection of plant leaf diseases using stacking hybrid learning.

Abdullah Sheneamer

RetractedAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullah SheneamerDepartment of Computer Science, College of Engineering and Computer Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2372-4154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early identification of pests and diseases in crops now presents a significant challenge. Different methods have been used to resolve this problem. Sticky traps and black light traps, used to identify diseases and for field monitoring, are examples of a manual procedure for analysing the diseases. A lot of time is required, and it is less effective to manually inspect larger crop fields manually. To serve requires a professional, so it is, therefore, costly. The use of sticky traps, where by bugs stick to the material upon contact, is one method of disease monitoring. A camera is used to take a picture of the sticky trap. From the picture using the average disease count, this image is then processed to ascertain the pet density for a specific time period. Such manual methods, as well as providing an effective outcome also pose a danger to the environment. This is because farmers spray pesticides in large quantities as a preventative measure. Various approaches have been used to identify diseases, including image processing and sophisticated algorithms. The most effective method of disease identification from crops is automatic detection using methods of image processing and classification algorithms for the diseases to be categorised based on different picture attributes. With a stacking stacking hybrid learning with scratch and transfer learning strategies, which is utilised in this work, a model that has already been trained is used to learn on images of diverse fruit plant leaves from the Plant Village dataset, spanning both safe samples and various illnesses. This reasearch paper used ensemble CNN and we achieved accuracy between 99.75% to 100%.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesAlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39576802
PMCPMC11584102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.