Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576791›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Evidence for a specific distortion in perceptual body image in eating disorders: A replication and extension.

Lise Gulli Brokjøb, Piers L Cornelissen, Jiří Gumančík, Kristofor McCarty, Martin J Tovée, Katri K Cornelissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lise Gulli BrokjøbDepartment of Psychology, The Artic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Piers L CornelissenDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-9581
Jiří GumančíkDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-5930
Kristofor McCartyDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Martin J TovéeDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Katri K CornelissenDepartment of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A core feature of eating disorders, such as anorexia nervosa, is an overestimation of body size. A key question is whether this overestimation arises solely from body image concerns typical in eating disorders, or if there is an additional perceptual disturbance. To address this question, we applied a two-component model of body size estimation that has been thoroughly replicated in the body image literature concerning healthy individuals. This model shows statistically independent, additive effects on body size estimates of: a) body image concerns, and b) a perceptual component known as contraction bias. Here body image concerns were defined by a principal components analysis (PCA) of psychometric tasks including the: Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory, Body Shape Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire-4. The PCA identified three components referred to as PSYCH, FAMPEER, and ATHIN. We investigated the influence of age, personal body mass index (BMI), and these three components on body size estimation in 33 women with a current or past history of eating disorders and 100 healthy controls. Low-BMI control participants overestimated their size, while high-BMI controls underestimated their size, exhibiting the expected normal perceptual contraction bias. However, the women with a history of eating disorders showed no evidence of contraction bias, suggesting a different processing of perceptual aspects of body size estimation compared to controls. We discuss two putative mechanisms that can explain these differences in accuracy of personal body size estimation.

Indexed as

Body ImageFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexBody SizeCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisPsychometricsSelf ConceptSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39576791
PMCPMC11584124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.