Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576771›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Family lexicon: Using language models to encode memories of personally familiar and famous people and places in the brain.

Andrea Bruera, Massimo Poesio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrea BrueraMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Cognition and Plasticity Research Group, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-2483
Massimo PoesioMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Cognition and Plasticity Research Group, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about personally familiar people and places is extremely rich and varied, involving pieces of semantic information connected in unpredictable ways through past autobiographical memories. In this work, we investigate whether we can capture brain processing of personally familiar people and places using subject-specific memories, after transforming them into vectorial semantic representations using language models. First, we asked participants to provide us with the names of the closest people and places in their lives. Then we collected open-ended answers to a questionnaire, aimed at capturing various facets of declarative knowledge. We collected EEG data from the same participants while they were reading the names and subsequently mentally visualizing their referents. As a control set of stimuli, we also recorded evoked responses to a matched set of famous people and places. We then created original semantic representations for the individual entities using language models. For personally familiar entities, we used the text of the answers to the questionnaire. For famous entities, we employed their Wikipedia page, which reflects shared declarative knowledge about them. Through whole-scalp time-resolved and searchlight encoding analyses, we found that we could capture how the brain processes one's closest people and places using person-specific answers to questionnaires, as well as famous entities. Overall encoding performance was significant in a large time window (200-800ms). Using spatio-temporal EEG searchlight, we found that we could predict brain responses significantly better than chance earlier (200-500ms) in bilateral temporo-parietal electrodes and later (500-700ms) in frontal and posterior central electrodes. We also found that XLM, a contextualized (or large) language model, provided superior encoding scores when compared with a simpler static language model as word2vec. Overall, these results indicate that language models can capture subject-specific semantic representations as they are processed in the human brain, by exploiting small-scale distributional lexical data.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyLanguageSemanticsAdultEvoked PotentialsFamous PersonsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMemory, EpisodicRecognition, PsychologySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39576771
PMCPMC11584084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.