Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576766›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Nurturing humanism and professionalism in a clinical setting: A multicenter study to develop a framework for a learning module for clinical students.

Rita Mustika, Anyta Pinasthika, Nadia Greviana, Eti Poncorini Pamungkasari, Annang Giri Moelyo, Rahma Tsania Zhuhra

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rita MustikaMedical Education Collaboration Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6891-769X
Anyta PinasthikaMedical Education Collaboration Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Nadia GrevianaMedical Education Collaboration Cluster, Indonesian Medical Education and Research Institute (IMERI), Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Eti Poncorini PamungkasariDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo, Indonesia.
Annang Giri MoelyoDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo, Indonesia.
Rahma Tsania ZhuhraDepartment of Medical Education, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2216-6015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProfessionalism represents a contract between physicians and society, with humanism at its core. Humanism must be developed in medical education, especially in clinical settings, as students meet real-life professional situations. However, dynamic and unpredictable clinical settings might expose students to authentic yet unexpected far-from-ideal situations that might hinder the humanism and professionalism process. Furthermore, culture plays an influential role, highlighting the importance of developing an appropriate and contextual learning strategy. Hence, this study aims to conceptualize strategies to teach humanism and professionalism in high-power distance and collectivistic settings.

methodsThis multicenter qualitative phenomenological study used maximum variation sampling to recruit participants, consisting of clinical students, teachers, and coordinators from three medical schools in Indonesia. Data were collected through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was conducted using the steps of coding and theorization methods.

resultsA total of 15 FGDs and one in-depth interview were conducted with 57 students, 39 teachers, and 18 coordinators. Socialization theory was used to analyze themes, leading to a culturally related approach to learning. Professional identity formation (PIF) was highlighted as the center of learning humanism and professionalism, with character building as the main principle. Designing a curriculum for humanism and professionalism for clinical learning should consider the longitudinal nature of PIF and ensure that professionalism explicitly exists in the curricula. As cultural impact might pose challenges, it must also be acknowledged and addressed. Meaningful integrated learning experiences, patient exposure, and reflection serve as the cornerstones of teaching-learning strategies while considering longitudinally explicit assessments.

conclusionNurturing humanism and professionalism in undergraduate clinical settings is a longitudinal character-building process, with PIF as its center. Longitudinal, explicit, and dynamic strategies should be considered as part of the framework of teaching-learning and assessment of humanism and professionalism, as well as faculty development efforts with close attention to cultural factors.

Indexed as

HumanismLearningProfessionalismStudents, MedicalAdultCurriculumEducation, MedicalFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIndonesiaMaleQualitative ResearchYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39576766
PMCPMC11584111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.