Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576644›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among Patients Receiving Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Amisha Wallia, Shivani Agarwal, Andrew L Owen, Emily L Lam, Ka'Derricka Davis, Stacy C Bailey, Sean E DeLacey, Allison P Pack, Juan Espinoza, Dana Bright and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07587151 (The Role of Remote Pharmacy Services With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in an Underserved Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07587151 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Remote Pharmacy Services With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in an Underserved Population

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled46ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsCGM plus telehealth, CGM only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Beyond Coverage Expansion: Exploring Persistent Barriers to CGM Utilization in the Clinical Environment.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What's New and Around the Corner in CGM?Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amisha WalliaDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Shivani AgarwalFleischer Institute for Diabetes and Metabolism, Montefiore-Einstein, Bronx, New York.
Andrew L OwenChicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Chicago, Illinois.
Emily L LamDivision of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ka'Derricka DavisDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Stacy C BaileyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Sean E DeLaceyDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Allison P PackDivision of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Juan EspinozaDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Dana BrightAllianceChicago, Illinois.
Alice EgglestonAllianceChicago, Illinois.
Eve WalterAllianceChicago, Illinois.
Matthew J O'BrienChicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been found to improve diabetes care processes and outcomes, adoption remains low. Objective: To examine the association between CGM prescriptions and individual characteristics among patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes (T1D and T2D, respectively). Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study using electronic health record data for patients with T1D or T1D from 275 clinic sites nationwide between January 2014 and February 2021. All participating clinics were federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), the largest US system of primary care for vulnerable populations. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, and CGM prescription orders. Results: A total of 1168 patients with T1D (mean [SD] age, 41.8 [16.0] years; 600 [51.4%] male; 372 [31.9%] Black; 262 [22.4%] Hispanic, and 750 [64.2%] White patients) and 35 216 patients with T2D (mean [SD] age, 58.4 [13.1] years; 19 772 [56.1%] female; 12 030 [34.2%] Black; 12 979 [36.9%] Hispanic, and 20 413 [58.0] White patients) were included. Overall, CGM prescriptions were infrequent (129 [11.0%] for patients with T1D and 362 [1.0%] for those with T2D) but increased throughout the study period. Among patients with T1D, those who reported Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16-0.57), Black race (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.99), or were uninsured (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74) had lower multivariable odds of receiving a CGM prescription than White or insured adults, respectively. Similar findings were observed among patients with T2D reporting Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.32-0.57), Black race (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98), or being uninsured (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31-0.58), relative to their counterparts. Among patients with T2D, hemoglobin A1c values higher than 9.0% (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 2.37-4.21) and a greater burden of diabetes complications were associated with higher odds of CGM prescription. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of electronic health record data, rates of CGM prescription orders were low among FQHC patients with T1D and T2D. Disparities in CGM orders were observed among patients reporting Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, and those who lacked health insurance. Future research is needed to understand the causes of infrequent CGM orders in FQHCs and drivers of observed disparities in this vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Healthcare DisparitiesAdultAgedBlood GlucoseContinuous Glucose MonitoringCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSafety-net ProvidersUnited StatesBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID39576644
PMCPMC11584923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.