Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576640›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Disparities by Race and Urbanicity in Online Health Care Facility Reviews.

Neil K R Sehgal, Anish K Agarwal, Lauren Southwick, Arthur P Pelullo, Lyle Ungar, Raina M Merchant, Sharath Chandra Guntuku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neil K R SehgalComputer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Anish K AgarwalLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lauren SouthwickPenn Medicine Center for Health Care Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Arthur P PelulloPenn Medicine Center for Health Care Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Lyle UngarComputer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Raina M MerchantLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sharath Chandra GuntukuComputer and Information Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Funding

Investigating and identifying the heterogeneity in COVID-19 misinformation exposure on social media among Black and Rural communities to inform precision public health messagingR01MD018340 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUNTUKU, SHARATH CHANDRA · 2022 to 2024
$2.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Online review platforms offer valuable insights into patient satisfaction and the quality of health care services, capturing content and trends that traditional metrics might miss. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health care services, influencing patient experiences. Objective: To examine health care facility numerical ratings and patient experience reported on an online platform by facility type and area demographic characteristics after the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, post-COVID). Design, Setting, and Participants: All reviews of US health care facilities posted on one online platform from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2023, were obtained for this cross-sectional study. Analyses focused on facilities providing essential health benefits, which are service categories that health insurance plans must cover under the Affordable Care Act. Facility zip code tabulation area level demographic data were obtained from US census and rural-urban commuting area codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in the percentage of positive reviews (defined as reviews with ≥4 of 5 stars) before and post-COVID. Secondary outcomes included the association between positive ratings and facility demographic characteristics (race and ethnicity and urbanicity), and thematic analysis of review content using latent Dirichlet allocation. Results: A total of 1 445 706 reviews across 151 307 facilities were included. The percent of positive reviews decreased from 54.3% to 47.9% (P < .001) after March 2020. Rural areas, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents, and areas with a higher proportion of White residents experienced lower positive ratings post-COVID, while reviews in areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents were less negatively impacted (P < .001 for all comparisons). For example, logistic regression showed that rural areas had significantly lower odds of positive reviews post-COVID compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83). Latent Dirichlet allocation identified themes such as billing issues, poor customer service, and insurance handling that increased post-COVID among certain communities. For instance, areas with a higher proportion of Black residents and areas with a higher proportion of Hispanic residents reported increases in insurance and billing issues, while areas with a higher proportion of White residents reported increases in wait time among negative reviews. Conclusions and Relevance: This serial cross-sectional study observed a significant decrease in positive reviews for health care facilities post-COVID. These findings underscore a disparity in patient experience, particularly in rural areas and areas with the highest proportions of Black and White residents.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesRacial GroupsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHealth FacilitiesHumansPandemicsPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health CareUnited StatesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID39576640
PMCPMC11584935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.