Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576610›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Using Callus as an Ex Vivo System for Chromatin Analysis.

Orly Lavie, Leor Eshed Williams

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Orly LavieThe Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.
Leor Eshed WilliamsThe Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel. leor.williams@mail.huji.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing has revolutionized epigenetics research, enabling a comprehensive analysis of DNA methylation and histone modification profiles to explore complex biological systems at unprecedented depth. Deciphering the intricate epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene activity presents significant challenges, including the issue of analyzing heterogeneous cell populations in bulk. Bulk analysis introduces bias and can obscure crucial information by averaging readouts from distinct cells. Various approaches have been developed to address this issue, such as cell-type-specific enrichment or single-cell sequencing techniques. However, the need for transgenic lines with fluorescent markers, along with technical challenges such as efficient protoplast isolation and low yield, limits their widespread adoption and use in multi-omic studies. This review discusses the pros and cons of these approaches, providing a valuable basis for selecting the most suitable strategy to minimize heterogeneity. We will also highlight the use of cotyledon-derived callus as an ex vivo system as a simple, accessible, and robust platform for enabling high-throughput multi-omic analyses.

Indexed as

ChromatinCotyledonDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingChromatinChIP-seqEpigenomeMulti-omics analysisSingle-cell sequencingTissue heterogeneityTissue microdissectionTranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.