Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576597›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

ChIP-Rx: Arabidopsis Chromatin Profiling Using Quantitative ChIP-Seq.

Adrien Vidal, Lorenzo Concia, Martin Rougée, Clara Bourbousse, Fredy Barneche

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrien VidalInstitut de biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5139-6445
Lorenzo ConciaInstitut de biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7401-7214
Martin RougéeInstitut de biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France.
Clara BourbousseInstitut de biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France. clara.richet-bourbousse@sorbonne-universite.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-6464-6124
Fredy BarnecheInstitut de biologie de l'École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, Université PSL, Paris, France. fredy.barneche@sorbonne-universite.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7014-7097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) is widely used to probe the chromatin landscape of transcription factors, chromatin components, and associated proteins. Conventional ChIP normalization procedures robustly allow estimating differences in local enrichment across genomic regions. Yet, inter-sample comparisons can be biased by technical variability and biological differences. This is notably the case when samples display large differences in the abundance of the target protein or its enrichment at chromatin. For example, epigenome defects are improperly detected or quantified upon large-effect genetic or chemical inhibition of chromatin modifiers. To circumvent these caveats and robustly determine biological variations while minimizing technical variability, ChIP adaptations using an external reference have flourished. Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol employing a reference exogenous chromatin (ChIP-Rx) that allows absolute comparisons of epigenome variations in Arabidopsis samples displaying drastic differences in chromatin mark abundance. In contrast to the originally published ChIP-Rx approach, which assumes that exogenous spike-in references are constant across samples, the method detailed here involves the sequencing of each input sample to account for technical variability in initial reference chromatin contents. We also report a detailed computational workflow with an accompanying Github resource to help in calculating spike-in normalization factors, applying them to normalize epigenome tracks, and performing spike-in normalized inter-sample differential analyses. We propose two ways of computing the spike-in factor: a classically used method based on raw counts and a noise-corrected method using peak detection on the exogenous genome.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisChromatinChromatin Immunoprecipitation SequencingChromatin ImmunoprecipitationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingChromatinArabidopsis thalianaChIP-seqChromatin immunoprecipitationHistonePlantspike-in

Identifiers

PMID39576597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.