Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576572›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

The Iconic α-Helix: From Pauling to the Present.

George D Rose

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

George D RoseJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. grose@jhu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protein folding problem dates back to Pauling's insights almost a century ago, but the first venture into actual protein structure was the Pauling-Corey-Brandson α-helix in 1951, a proposed model that was confirmed almost immediately using X-ray crystallography. Many subsequent efforts to predict protein helices from the amino acid sequence met with only partial success, as discussed here. Surprisingly, in 2021, these efforts were superseded by deep-learning artificial intelligence, especially AlphaFold2, a machine learning program based on neural nets. This approach can predict most protein structures successfully at or near atomic resolution. Deservedly, deep-learning artificial intelligence was named Science magazine's 2021 "breakthrough of the year." Today, ~200 million predicted protein structures can be downloaded from the AlphaFold2 Protein Structure Database. Deep learning represents a deep conundrum because these successfully predicted macromolecular structures are based on methods that are completely devoid of a hypothesis or of any physical chemistry. Perhaps we are now poised to transcend five centuries of reductive science.

Indexed as

Protein Conformation, alpha-HelicalProtein FoldingProteinsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinDeep LearningModels, MolecularProteinsChiralityHelix cappingHelix propensitiesHydrogen bondingNeural netsProtein scaffoldsReductionist science

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.