Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576563›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2025

Artificial intelligence improves risk prediction in cardiovascular disease.

Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale, Htet Lin Htun, Mor Vered, Alice J Owen, Joanne Ryan, Andrew Tonkin, Rosanne Freak-Poli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Achamyeleh Birhanu TeshaleSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7572-9993
Htet Lin HtunSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2307-0610
Mor VeredDepartment of Data Science and AI, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5286-6509
Alice J OwenSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4807-6069
Joanne RyanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7039-6325
Andrew TonkinSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5291-0610
Rosanne Freak-PoliSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Rosanne.Freak-Poli@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4072-8699

Funding

ASPirin in Reducing Events in the ElderlyU01AG029824 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES, MURRAY, ANNE M · 2009 to 2018
$64.6M
Main Administrative CoreU19AG062682 · NIA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHAN, ANDREW T, MCNEIL, JOHN JAMES · 2019 to 2023
$42.9M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUPR03CA062682 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB AND GYN · PI PARK, ROBERT C · 1995 to 1996
–
Monash University Monash International Tuition ScholarshipMonash University the Monash Graduate ScholarshipNational Health and Medical Research Council 1127060National Health and Medical Research Council 334047NCI NIH HHS U19AG062682NIA NIH HHS U01 AG029824NIA NIH HHS U01AG029824NIA NIH HHS U19 AG062682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a major public health issue, claiming numerous lives. This study aimed to demonstrate the advantages of employing artificial intelligence (AI) models to improve the prediction of CVD risk using a large cohort of relatively healthy adults aged 70 years or more. In this study, deep learning (DL) models provide enhanced predictions (DeepSurv: C-index = 0.662, Integrated Brier Score (IBS) = 0.046; Neural Multi-Task Logistic Regression (NMTLR): C-index = 0.660, IBS = 0.047), as compared to the conventional (Cox: C-index = 0.634, IBS = 0.048) and machine learning (Random Survival Forest (RSF): C-index = 0.641, IBS = 0.048) models. The risk scores generated by the DL models also demonstrated superior performance. Moreover, AI models (NMTLR, DeepSurv, and RSF) were more effective, requiring the treatment of only 9 to 10 patients to prevent one CVD event, compared to the conventional model requiring treatment of nearly four times higher number of patients (NNT = 38). In summary, AI models, particularly DL models, possess superior predictive capabilities that can enhance patient treatment in a more cost-effective manner. Nonetheless, AI tools should serve to complement and assist healthcare professionals, rather than supplant them. The DeepSurv model, selected due to its relatively superior performance, is deployed in the form of web application locally, and is accessible on GitHub ( https://github.com/Robidar/Chuchu_Depl ). Finally, as we have demonstrated the benefit of using AI for reassessment of an existing CVD risk score, we recommend other infamous risk scores undergo similar reassessment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiovascular DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overDeep LearningFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceCardiovascular diseaseDeep learning

Identifiers

PMID39576563
PMCPMC12396998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.