ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
In Silico Clinical Trial for Osteoporosis Treatments to Prevent Hip Fractures: Simulation of the Placebo Arm.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The arrival of digital twins and in silico trials in drug development.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis represents a major healthcare concern. The development of novel treatments presents challenges due to the limited cost-effectiveness of clinical trials and ethical concerns associated with placebo-controlled trials. Computational models for the design and assessment of biomedical products (In Silico Trials) are emerging as a promising alternative. In this study, a novel In Silico Trial technology (BoneStrength) was applied to replicate the placebo arms of two concluded clinical trials and its accuracy in predicting hip fracture incidence was evaluated. Two virtual cohorts (N = 1238 and 1226, respectively) were generated by sampling a statistical anatomy atlas based on CT scans of proximal femurs. Baseline characteristics were equivalent to those reported for the clinical cohorts. Fall events were sampled from a Poisson distribution. A multiscale stochastic model was implemented to estimate the impact force associated to each fall. Finite Element models were used to predict femur strength. Fracture incidence in 3 years follow-up was computed with a Markov chain approach; a patient was considered fractured if the impact force associated with a fall exceeded femur strength. Ten realizations of the stochastic process were run to reach convergence. Each realization required approximately 2500 FE simulations, solved using High-Performance Computing infrastructures. Predicted number of fractures was 12 ± 2 and 18 ± 4 for the two cohorts, respectively. The predicted incidence range consistently included the reported clinical data, although on average fracture incidence was overestimated. These findings highlight the potential of BoneStrength for future applications in drug development and assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.