ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2025
A case of pancreatic fistula with disruption of the inferior branch of the pancreatic duct caused by a pancreatic stent after endoscopic papillectomy.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 73-year-old man underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for abdominal pain, which revealed an ampullary adenoma with no obvious extension into the bile or pancreatic ducts. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) was performed and a 5-Fr 5-cm stent was placed in the pancreatic duct. The patient developed acute pancreatitis on postoperative day (POD) 1 and contrast-enhanced computed tomography performed on POD 2 revealed that the proximal end of the stent had migrated into the retroperitoneum, forming a pancreatic fistula. Stent removal and endoscopic nasopancreatic drainage were performed and the pancreatitis rapidly improved. The tumor was completely resected and after approximately three years of follow-up, no tumor recurrence or acute pancreatitis was observed.Retrospectively, the inferior branch of the pancreatic duct was prominent on pancreatography at the time of EP and the proximal end of the stent had dislocated into the inferior branch. The stent subsequently moved proximally, which could have caused pancreatitis and pancreatic fistula. The morphology of the pancreatic duct should be carefully monitored during stenting. Selecting a stent that matches each patient's specific pancreatic duct morphology may help physicians minimize the risk of adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39576492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.