ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Disparities in Palliative Treatment Utilization in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- At the End of Life: The Impact and Disparities of Palliative Care Utilization Among Deceased Gastric Cancer Patients in US Hospitals.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) often require multidisciplinary interventions due to the diversity of symptoms. Palliative treatment offers benefits including improved quality of life, yet sociodemographic disparities influence its utilization. This study aims to characterize these disparities in palliative treatment use among mCRC patients.
methodsUtilizing data from the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with mCRC between 2016 and 2020. Patients were categorized by metastatic site: peritoneal, liver, lung, or bone/brain/lymph node. Palliative treatment rates were compared across metastatic sites as well as patient and hospital factors.
resultsA total of 106,241 patients were identified as having mCRC, with 19,208 (18.08%) receiving palliative treatment; 24.0% of patients with multiple metastatic disease and 14.0% of those with solely peritoneal metastases (PM) utilized palliative treatment (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients over 75 years of age had a significantly decreased likelihood of receiving palliative treatment compared with younger patients (p = 0.0002). Hispanic patients did not differ significantly from non-Hispanic White populations (p = 0.47). Those in the highest education quartile demonstrated a higher degree of palliative treatment use compared with the lowest education quartile (p = 0.0081).
conclusionAmong patients with mCRC, those with multiple sites of metastatic disease tend to receive higher rates of palliative treatment compared with those with oligometastatic disease. Patients with PM had the lowest rate of receiving palliative treatment. Other determinates of utilizing palliative treatment include younger age groups and higher education. Further research is warranted to understand the patterns of disparities in palliative treatment use among mCRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39576451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.