SynthesisAdvances in therapy2025
Efanesoctocog Alfa Versus Emicizumab in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04161495 (A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN Fusion Protein), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Open-Label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN Fusion Protein (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN; BIVV001) in Previously Treated Patients ≥12 Years of Age With Severe Hemophilia A
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of Emicizumab Treatment for Haemophilia A Paediatric Patients: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaPooled it
- Integration of Efanesoctocog Alfa in Clinical Practice for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Severe Haemophilia A.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe phase 3 XTEND-1 trial (NCT04161495) demonstrated that efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection compared with pre-trial factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare the efficacy of efanesoctocog alfa with non-factor replacement therapy emicizumab in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.
methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify phase 3 trials of emicizumab. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds, and joint health (measured using Hemophilia Joint Health Score [HJHS]), between efanesoctocog alfa and emicizumab. Estimated effects for different emicizumab regimens were pooled using random-effect meta-analysis to evaluate the overall difference in bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and emicizumab.
resultsOne emicizumab trial was included (HAVEN 3), which investigated three dosing regimens. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa once-weekly (Q1W) was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any (incidence rate ratio [95% CI] 0.33 [0.20; 0.53]), any treated (0.49 [0.30; 0.80]) and treated joint (0.51 [0.28; 0.91]) bleeds compared with emicizumab Q1W in non-inhibitor patients with prior prophylaxis or on-demand treatment. Efanesoctocog alfa Q1W was also associated with a significantly better improvement from baseline in HJHS Joint Score (mean difference [95% CI] -2.06 [-3.97; -0.14]) and Total Score (-2.37 [-4.36; -0.39]) versus emicizumab Q1W or every 2 weeks.
conclusionEfanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis was associated with significantly lower rates of any, treated, and joint bleeds and improved joint health compared with emicizumab in patients with severe haemophilia A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.