Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576396›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2024

Etiology and antimicrobial resistance of subclinical mastitis pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. in sheep milk.

Ionica Iancu, Violeta Igna, Sebastian Alexandru Popa, Kálmán Imre, Corina Pascu, Luminița Costinar, Janos Degi, Alexandru Gligor, Vlad Iorgoni, Corina Badea and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ecological Dynamics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Raw Sheep Milk as a Reservoir of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Mechanisms of host-bacterial interactions duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ionica IancuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Violeta IgnaDepartment of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Sebastian Alexandru PopaDepartment of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timișoara, Calea Aradului No. 119, Timişoara, 300645, Romania. popa_sebastian_alexandru@yahoo.com.
Kálmán ImreDepartment of Animal Production and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timișoara, Calea Aradului No. 119, Timişoara, 300645, Romania.
Corina PascuDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Luminița CostinarDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Janos DegiDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Alexandru GligorDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Vlad IorgoniDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Corina BadeaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.
Ileana NichitaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania.
Viorel HermanDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences "King Mihai I" from Timişoara, Timişoara, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis in Țurcana sheep flocks located in south-western Romania. Milchtest and California Mastitis Test (CMT), were used for the detection of subclinical mastitis. A number of 360 milk samples across three lactation phases were analyzed. Subclinical mastitis was identified in 146 (40.6%) of sheep milk samples. Only milk samples (n = 146) collected from sheep diagnosed with subclinical mastitis were considered for microbiological analyses. Thus, Staphylococcus aureus (129/146; 88.4%) was identified as the predominant pathogen followed by Streptococcus spp. (14/146; 9.6%) Enterococcus spp. (7/146; 4.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6/146; 4.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (5/146; 3.4%). Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. was also tested. The results showed varying resistance patterns depending on the farm and microorganism. In heard A the highest resistance of Staphylococcus aureus was identified to polymyxin B (79.7%) followed by novobiocin (73.4%) and tetracycline (45.3%); Streptococcus spp. to streptomycin (100%), novobiocin (100%), tetracycline (100%) and Enterococcus spp. to tylosin (100%), streptomycin (75.0%) and tetracycline (75.0%). In herd B, Staphylococcus aureus showed high resistance rates to polymyxin B (86.3%), novobiocin (74.5%) and cloxacillin (39.2%); Streptococcus spp. strains to streptomycin (100%), novobiocin (100%), tetracycline (100%) and Enterococcus spp. to gentamicin (100%), streptomycin (66.7%) and erythromycin (66.7%). The obtained preliminary results indicate a potential risk that future treatments of sheep mastitis may not be effective, and demonstrated that raw unpasteurized milk can harbor antimicrobial resistance pathogens posing a threat to public health. However, further investigations involving molecular research on resistance genes are required to draw comprehensive conclusions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcusMastitisMilkSheep DiseasesStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcusAnimalsFemaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceRomaniaSheepStaphylococcal InfectionsStreptococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceFoodborne bacteriaMilkRomaniaSheepȚurcana breed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.