Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576322›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

Application of artificial intelligence in laryngeal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alejandro R Marrero-Gonzalez, Tanner J Diemer, Shaun A Nguyen, Terence J M Camilon, Kirsten Meenan, Ashli O'Rourke

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An interpretable multi-instance learning method for accurate differentiation of malignant and benign laryngeal lesions in laryngoscopy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Videomics and artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnosis of laryngeal lesions: mapping current evidence through a scoping review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Review
  4. Multicenter Clinical Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Classification Model for Laryngoscopy Images.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Intraoperative fluorescence in solid head and neck cancer: A scoping review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Clinical Applications of Laryngeal Ultrasonography: A Review.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2025
    Review
  7. Feasibility of improving vocal fold pathology image classification with synthetic images generated by DDPM-based GenAI: a pilot study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro R Marrero-GonzalezDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7961-6112
Tanner J DiemerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Shaun A NguyenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. nguyensh@musc.edu.
Terence J M CamilonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Kirsten MeenanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Ashli O'RourkeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted technologies, including endoscopy, voice analysis, and histopathology, for detecting and classifying laryngeal lesions.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, etc. for studies utilizing voice analysis, histopathology for laryngeal lesions, or AI-assisted endoscopy. The results of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were synthesized by a meta-analysis.

results12 studies employing AI-assisted endoscopy, 2 studies for voice analysis, and 4 studies for histopathology were included in the meta-analysis. The combined sensitivity of AI-assisted endoscopy was 91% (95% CI 87-94%) for the classification of benign from malignant lesions and 91% (95% CI 90-93%) for lesion detection. The highest accuracy pooled in detecting lesions versus healthy tissue was the AI-aided endoscopy was 94% (95% CI 92-97%).

conclusionsFor laryngeal lesions, AI-assisted endoscopy shows excellent diagnosis accuracy. But more sizable prospective trials are needed to confirm the practical clinical value.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLaryngeal DiseasesLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngoscopyHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDiagnostic toolsEndoscopyHistopathologyLaryngologyLarynxVoice analysis

Identifiers

PMID39576322
PMCPMC11890366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.