Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576309›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease.

Pedro Valente Aguiar, Paulo Pereira, Anne F Mannion, Pedro Santos Silva

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A crosswalk for the conversion of scores between the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the neck version of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI-neck).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Methodological considerations in calculating the minimal clinically important change score for the core outcome measures index (COMI): insights from a large single-centre spine surgery registry.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro Valente AguiarNeurosurgery Department, ULS São João- University Hospital, Alameda Prof Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal. pedrovalenteaguiar@protonmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4279-3315
Paulo PereiraNeurosurgery Department, ULS São João- University Hospital, Alameda Prof Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.
Anne F MannionDepartment Teaching, Research and Development, Spine Division, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pedro Santos SilvaNeurosurgery Department, ULS São João- University Hospital, Alameda Prof Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, 4200-319, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to validate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) neck for use in Portuguese patients with cervical spine degenerative disease and define the minimal clinically important change score (MCIC) for this questionnaire and population.

methodsThe COMI translation and cross-cultural adaptation was done following published guidelines. Patients awaiting surgery in a neurosurgical centre completed the COMI, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and EQ-5D questionnaires, a pain visual analog scale (VAS) twice within a 5-to-15-day period, and a Global Treatment Outcome (GTO) question evaluating whether a clinical status change had occurred during that period. The MCIC was obtained through an anchor method by analysis of changes in pre- to postoperative total COMI scores and GTO dichotomized answers.

resultsThe COMI first assessment was completed by 101 patients and 72 patients completed both assessments. The questionnaire showed good construct validity (n = 72 patients) as predefined hypotheses were confirmed: scores on each COMI domain correlated with a Spearman ρ > 0.4 with scores for the corresponding domain on other questionnaires and COMI total score displayed good correlation with total NDI score (ρ = 0.67) and EQ-5D total score (ρ = 0.55). Test-retest reliability (n = 72 patients) was confirmed through high intraclass correlation coefficients. The MCIC (n = 76 patients) was calculated as 2 points.

conclusionThe COMI (neck) psychometric qualities were confirmed, such that it can be considered a valid and reliable questionnaire to be applied in the European Portuguese population with surgical cervical spine degenerative disease, with an MCIC of 2 points.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeOutcome Assessment, Health CareSpinal DiseasesAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCervical spine degenerative diseaseCOMI neckEuropean PortugueseMCICPROMs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.