ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2025
Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey.
Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring barriers to rehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study in Iran.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextEmerging data suggests that patients with a spinal cord injury (SCI) have a higher risk of developing cognitive impairment. The true incidence of cognitive impairment in this group is unclear due to the difficulty in administering commonly used assessment tools, which are dependent on functional abilities e.g. drawing and writing.
methodsA 16-question online survey, that aims to understand current practices on the assessment of cognition and the limitations of currently available tools, was sent via a Research Network Group to British Association of Spinal Cord Injury Specialists (BASCIS) registered clinicians at each of the 12 Spinal Injuries Centers in the UK and Ireland.
results41 responses from 11 different SCI centers, with most from clinicians who have worked with SCI patients for over 10 years. 68% felt that there was a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, 15% reported not using tools to screen for cognitive impairment, primarily due to lack of time, lack of guidelines, and physical disabilities affecting the ability to complete tests. When used, the most commonly utilized tools were those that rely on intact hand function.
conclusionsClinicians report a higher incidence of cognitive impairment in those with an SCI. However, currently used tools are not always appropriate, and patients with impaired hand function may be under-represented or undiagnosed. Further work is needed for a more standardized assessment tool to ensure that these patients receive appropriate diagnosis and management, particularly since cognitive impairment in this group can increase care needs and reduce engagement with rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.