ArticleRNA biology2024
A high-throughput search for intracellular factors that affect RNA folding identifies
Article in RNA biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The evolution of a NaJournal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- The evolution of a NabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
General RNA chaperones are RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that interact transiently and non-specifically with RNA substrates and assist in their folding into their native state. In bacteria, these chaperones impact both coding and non-coding RNAs and are particularly important for large, structured RNAs which are prone to becoming kinetically trapped in misfolded states. Currently, due to the limited number of well-characterized examples and the lack of a consensus structural or sequence motif, it is difficult to identify general RNA chaperones in bacteria. Here, we adapted a previously published
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.