Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39576148›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disabilities : JOID2026

The recognition and assessment of pain in people with profound intellectual disabilities by nurses: An appreciative inquiry.

Maeve Goodall, Kate Irving, Mary Nevin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maeve GoodallDublin City University, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-7418
Kate IrvingDublin City University, Ireland.
Mary NevinDublin City University, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with profound intellectual disabilities are non-verbal and reliant on carers for pain recognition, assessment and management. Pain is a multifaceted and interconnected experience. Assessment tools designed specifically for this population are needed. This study aimed to develop methods for improved pain care practices by nurses. This qualitative study followed the four phases of appreciative inquiry; Discovery, Dream, Design, Destiny. Eight nurses were recruited as co-researchers from one Irish intellectual disability organisation. Data were analysed from individual and focus group interviews, using thematic analysis and continuous reflexivity. A pain awareness campaign and RAPPID tool (recognition and assessment of pain in people with profound intellectual disabilities) were developed. Respect for personhood in individuals with profound intellectual disabilities is reflected through holistic approaches to pain assessment. The empowerment of nurses enables positive change. Implicit knowledge can be communicated more proficiently with a formal, collaborative tool.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityPainPain MeasurementAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAssessmentawarenesspainprofound intellectual disabilitiestool

Identifiers

PMID39576148
PMCPMC13049226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.