ArticlemBio2025
Bacterial interactions underpin worsening lung function in cystic fibrosis-associated infections.
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Metabolite Production Underlies Disruption of the Cystic Fibrosis Airway Microbiota by Pathogens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Remodelling of cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota in response to extended elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor therapy.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Nontuberculous mycobacteria remodel lung microbiota in cystic fibrosis-associated respiratory infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Species turnover within cystic fibrosis lung microbiota is indicative of acute pulmonary exacerbation onset.Microbiome · 2025Article
- Building microbial communities to improve antimicrobial strategies.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- The Respiratory Tract Microbiome and Human Health.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic lung infections are the primary cause of morbidity and early mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF) and, as such, have been the subject of a great deal of research. Subsequently, they have become one of the key paradigms for polymicrobial infections. The literature, however, has traditionally focused on the presence of pathogens in isolation or univariate measures like number of species to predict decline of lung function and ignores large swathes of data. Here, we suggest that looking at the interactions between species identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, rather than at species singularly, could elucidate hitherto unknown properties of these complicated infections. To confirm this, pooled samples from studies conducted by our laboratory, sequenced using the same pipeline, were used to assess microbiome-wide associations to lung function. We found pathogenic interactions between species were limited to the most abundant species, which were composed of canonical CF pathogens (including IMPORTANCE: Research studies have repeatedly demonstrated that chronic lung infection in cystic fibrosis is polymicrobial and consequently does not adhere to the single microbe-based Koch's postulates. Despite the plethora of evidence, the role of the constituent taxa present is largely unknown. Here we demonstrate how an ecological modeling perspective on lung infection microbiota can tease out potential interactions that alter progression of disease. Using techniques akin to genome-wide association studies, we show and validate 22 taxa, present in the chronic respiratory disease associated with cystic fibrosis, which have significant interactions that are negatively associated with patient lung function, the majority of which are "non-pathogenic" organisms. This work highlights the need to understand the interactive landscapes of the microbiomes to fully appreciate the complexity and treat chronic lung infections. Furthermore, this presents testable hypotheses for manipulative experiments in model systems to elucidate key mechanisms to driving disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.