ArticlemBio2025
Article in mBio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breaking the Stalemate: Advancing Sepsis Therapeutics Beyond Supportive Care.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2026Article
- Elevated Spleen Tyrosine Kinase in Low-Density Neutrophils During Bacterial Sepsis in a Nonhuman Primate Model.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from COVID-19 patients: a single-center retrospective analysis in a tertiary hospital, China.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Reassessing sepsis research: new clues for old players and new players for an old symptom to improve patient outcomes.EXCLI journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonhuman primate models that closely emulate the disease course, pathogenesis, and supportive care provided to human patients in the modern intensive care unit with bacterial sepsis are urgently needed to study pathogenesis and assess novel therapies. We therefore developed a non-human primate model of septic shock that includes supportive care akin to a modern intensive care unit. In this study, we characterized pathogen kinetics and evaluated the physiologic, immunologic, and pathologic responses in this model of septic shock induced by the clinically relevant pathogen
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.